GH
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2024 delivered GAAP net loss per BUC of $(0.23) and CAD of $0.27, as non-cash unrealized derivative losses (~$9.7M) weighed on reported earnings while cash flows remained solid .
- Book value per unit increased to $14.15; units traded at $12.19 pre-release (a ~14% discount), with management prioritizing accretive investment deployment over buybacks—an important narrative for discount narrowing vs. capital allocation .
- Distribution held at $0.37 per BUC (paid Oct 31), supported by CAD and a hedged funding profile; portfolio performance remained stable with all MRB/GIL borrowers current and stabilized occupancy at 91.5% .
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) was unavailable for Q3; beat/miss analysis cannot be determined—prior quarters showed steady CAD ($0.27 in Q2) and positive GAAP EPS in Q1–Q2 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Steady performance” across the investment portfolio; all MRB and GIL investments current with no forbearance requests, and stabilized MFRB occupancy at 91.5% .
- Hedging strategy effective: net cash received from swaps of ~$1.8M in Q3 and ~$5.2M YTD; management remains “largely hedged” against rate moves per sensitivity analysis .
- Book value per unit rose to $14.15 (+$0.17 q/q), aided by tax-exempt rate declines lifting MRB fair value; CFO emphasized long-term hold strategy, insulating operating cash flows .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP optics: non-cash unrealized derivative losses (~$9.7M; ~$0.42 per BUC) drove a net loss despite positive CAD, obscuring underlying cash earnings .
- YoY revenue mix softness: total revenues fell to $24.35M from $26.47M in Q3’23, with property revenues at zero vs. $1.20M in Q3’23; other interest income also down YoY .
- Investor sentiment concern: public Q&A highlighted unit price underperformance and discount to book; management reiterated distribution decisions are CAD-driven, not price-driven .
Financial Results
Income Statement Summary
*Values retrieved from S&P Global were unavailable due to request limit; beat/miss cannot be determined.
Revenue Components (Segment-like breakdown)
Margins
Note: Margin = Net Income / Total Revenues, computed from cited figures.
KPIs and Balance/Portfolio Metrics
Guidance Changes
No formal revenue/EPS guidance was provided in Q3 materials.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We saw steady performance from our investment portfolio during the third quarter… We continue to focus on executing on our core investment strategy to provide consistent returns for our unitholders.”
- CFO: “Our book value per unit as of September 30th was… $14.15… [the] fair value of our mortgage revenue bond portfolio [rose as] tax-exempt rates decreased… changes in fair value… have no direct impact on our operating cash flows, net income or CAD.”
- CEO on swaps and cash flow: “We are currently a net receiver on all of our interest rate swaps… receiving compounded SOFR (4.90%) and paying… 3.52%… that… would result in us receiving approximately $2.8M in cash payments… reflected… in CAD.”
- CEO on capital allocation: “As long as we’re able to see accretive investments… a better use of the partnership’s capital… is making those investments as opposed to… buy[ing] units back.”
Q&A Highlights
- Policy outlook: LIHTC seen as bipartisan; potential 2025 tax bill could be a vehicle for improvements—supportive backdrop for affordable housing financing .
- BlackRock JV: Same construction loan product offered; JV provides dedicated capital, enabling scale and timely execution without relying solely on the LP balance sheet .
- Demand resilience: Despite rate volatility, sponsors continue pursuing MRB/GIL transactions; pipeline remains intact as projects “continue to pencil” with adjustments .
- Capital deployment & thresholds: Management requires accretion vs current dividend yield (~12.5%); aims to commit JV capital quickly to demonstrate execution .
- Investor concerns (price vs book): Management reiterated distributions are CAD-driven; buybacks deprioritized in favor of accretive investments; insider activity subject to trading windows .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus EPS and revenue estimates for Q3 2024 were unavailable due to request limit; consequently, we cannot assess beat/miss vs Street. Prior quarter context: Q2 delivered $0.19 EPS and $0.27 CAD per BUC; Q1 delivered $0.42 EPS and $0.23 CAD .
- Implication: With CAD stable and distribution maintained, near-term Street revisions likely focus on non-GAAP CAD durability and hedging effectiveness rather than GAAP volatility from derivatives .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- CAD stability and maintained $0.37 distribution underscore cash earnings resilience despite GAAP volatility from derivatives—focus on CAD over GAAP for valuation .
- Units trade at a material discount to book ($12.19 vs $14.15); management prefers deploying capital into accretive opportunities over buybacks—monitor pipeline conversion and potential discount narrowing catalysts .
- Rate hedging and the shift from variable TEBS to fixed 2024 PFA securitization reduce interest rate risk; sensitivity analysis shows limited CAD impact under reasonable rate shocks .
- Pipeline visibility: ~$160.2M in funding commitments and active JV equity program (Vantage, Freestone, seniors/market rate projects) support asset base growth over the next 18 months .
- Operational stability: All MRB/GIL borrowers current; stabilized occupancy at 91.5%; swap net receipts add cash to CAD—supports distribution sustainability .
- Watch policy tailwinds: Potential LIHTC enhancements in a 2025 tax bill could improve underwriting economics and volumes for affordable financing .
- Near-term trading: Expect narrative focus on discount-to-book, distribution visibility, and deployment pace of BlackRock JV; GAAP EPS can be noisy—CAD and book value trend are more likely stock movers .